196 comments • Comments Link

LG 用户反映的侵入性程度不一：有些设备会持续弹出 App 广告，另一些则仍只是简单的显示器。行业向"smart"功能和持续联网发展的趋势，主要由对经常性收入的渴望驱动，这通常把数据收集和广告整合置于用户体验之前。美国缺乏强有力的消费者保护法律，使企业能在极低问责制下运行，推动了诸如 Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) 这类曾被视为极端做法的操作。

将 Commercial Signage Displays（通常销售给企业）作为替代方案虽然价格更高，但对那些寻求无预装 bloatware 的"dumb"屏幕的用户来说，是一种可行的变通。 Android 的 Local Network Scanning 请求加剧了隐私担忧——尽管技术上是为投屏功能设计，但也引发了对未经授权数据采集的怀疑。 YouTube 等平台把视频标题的 A/B Testing 常态化，这助长了更广泛的不信任感，因为媒体内容越来越像是为了提高参与度而被操控。

可能的技术对策包括在网络层面屏蔽域名（Network-level Domain Blocking）和在路由器上设置白名单（Router-based Whitelisting），但这些方法需要大量精力并需持续维护。预装且无法删除的软件普遍存在，导致消费者感觉不再真正拥有自己购买的硬件。有人反复建议将 Smart Devices 完全断开互联网，但这往往会因软件更新、家庭成员使用的便利性以及设备对持续联网的需求而变得复杂。

通过 DMCA 等法律途径挑战对消费者不利的固件做法，往往会被用户普遍接受的 Terms of Service 所阻碍，这些条款优先保护制造商的控制权而非设备所有者的自主权。硬件向互联网连接和广告支持的转变，造成了制造商商业模式与消费者期望之间的严重脱节。尽管用户常尝试通过断网或寻找"dumb"替代品来减轻影响，但市场已在很大程度上放弃了对简单、非交互式显示器的偏好。人们在隐私和所有权方面普遍感到无力，因为公司通过数据收集并在设备界面植入广告，积极追求经常性收入。在监管尚未演进为以消费者透明度和控制为优先之前，用户只能依赖技术变通或利基市场中的 Commercial Hardware，来避免成为无法逃脱的广告生态系统的一部分。 • LG owners report varying levels of intrusiveness, with some units displaying persistent app advertisements and others remaining functional as simple monitors.

• Industry trends toward "smart" features and persistent connectivity are driven by a desire for recurring revenue, often prioritizing data collection and ad integration over user experience.

• The lack of robust consumer protection laws in the US allows companies to operate with minimal accountability, enabling practices like automatic content recognition (ACR) that were once considered extreme.

• Using commercial signage displays—products typically sold to businesses—serves as a viable, albeit more expensive, workaround for those seeking "dumb" screens without preinstalled bloatware.

• Privacy concerns are exacerbated by features like Android's request for local network scanning, which, while technically functional for casting, fuels suspicion regarding unauthorized data harvesting.

• Digital platforms like YouTube normalize A/B testing for video titles, a practice that contributes to a broader sense of distrust as media content appears increasingly manipulated for engagement.

• Potential technical countermeasures include network-level domain blocking and router-based whitelisting, though these require significant effort and ongoing maintenance.

• The prevalence of preinstalled, undeletable software has led to a market environment where consumers feel they no longer fully own the hardware they purchase.

• There is a recurring suggestion to simply disconnect smart devices from the internet entirely, yet this is often complicated by concerns over software updates, ease of use for family members, and persistent network connectivity.

• Exploring legal avenues like the DMCA to challenge anti-consumer firmware practices is hindered by broad, user-accepted terms of service that prioritize manufacturer control over owner agency.

The shift toward internet-connected, advertising-supported hardware has created a significant disconnect between manufacturer business models and consumer expectations. While users often attempt to mitigate this by isolating devices from the network or seeking out "dumb" alternatives, the market has largely abandoned the preference for simple, non-interactive displays. The consensus highlights a feeling of helplessness regarding privacy and ownership, as companies aggressively pursue recurring revenue streams through data collection and ad placement within the device's interface. Ultimately, the discussion suggests that until regulatory frameworks evolve to prioritize consumer transparency and control, users must rely on technical workarounds or niche commercial hardware to avoid becoming part of an inescapable advertising ecosystem.