I wish tech companies knew more about me
571 points
• 7 days ago
• Article
Link
尽管普遍说法认为科技公司通过侵入式的数据收集，对我们的个人生活了如指掌，但对许多用户来说，现实却出乎意料地脱节。尽管监控与机器学习的规模庞大，最终的结果往往却很平淡，甚至毫无意义。大多数算法并不会以惊人的精准度预判需求，而只是反复推送用户已经买过的商品，或是把与用户真实生活方式完全无关的产品硬塞过来。
这些系统的一个关键问题在于，它们根本抓不住基本的行为规律。比如音乐流媒体平台往往会无视长期偏好：明明一贯会跳过有人声的曲目，却仍偏向于偏好纯器乐的 techno 。搜索引擎和内容平台也常常把用户那种特定的、一次性的提问误当成持续存在的兴趣。当用户搜索某台特定电器的安装指南时，算法却会默认他突然对"烤箱"这个类别产生了普遍的执念，而不是识别出这不过是一个有针对性的、单次的实用需求。
语言和地区设置也暴露了个性化技术的巨大缺口。即便账号、浏览器和操作系统都被明确设置为英语，用户依然常常只因为自己的物理位置，就被推送当地语言的内容；而且这种情况即使在用户登录了会保存语言偏好的全球账号时也不会改变。无论是游戏商店界面被重置成 Finnish，还是银行应用推送无关的签证信息却完全忽略护照数据，整体数字体验都显得支离破碎，让人沮丧，同时也对用户已记录的身份缺乏基本的理解。
广告投放体验同样粗糙笨拙。用户经常被推送他们从不会购买的高价值商品，比如工业设备或营销软件，这类推荐往往只来自一次不小心点错的行为。于是就形成了恶性循环：一次错误的互动会让系统把用户归错类别，之后便无限期地沿着错误方向继续推送。此外，平台还会继续宣传与用户毫不相干的"家庭场景"或"金融需求"相关的产品，进一步证明那些被采集的大量个人数据，往往并没有真正用到有效的地方。
最终，这份挫败感来自一种反差：数据追踪的深度很惊人，但由此带来的用户体验却相当浅薄。被持续监视的感觉一直存在，可把这些数据真正用聪明的方式转化成帮助的能力却明显不足。既然公司已经在进行如此广泛的追踪，却依然做不到提供更相关的内容或记住简单的用户设置，这确实令人失望，也让"高度个性化"的技术承诺在很大程度上落了空。
While the common narrative suggests that tech companies possess an omniscient understanding of our personal lives through intrusive data collection, the reality for many users is surprisingly disconnected. Despite the massive scale of surveillance and machine learning, the actual output is often mundane or nonsensical. Rather than anticipating needs with uncanny accuracy, most algorithms merely repeat advertisements for items already purchased or push products that are completely irrelevant to the user's actual lifestyle.
A primary failure in these systems is their inability to grasp basic behavioral patterns. For instance, music streaming services consistently ignore long-standing preferences, such as the systematic skipping of vocal tracks in favor of instrumental techno. Similarly, search engines and content platforms frequently misinterpret specific, one-time inquiries as broad, ongoing interests. When a user searches for an installation guide for a specific appliance, the algorithm assumes a sudden obsession with ovens in general, rather than recognizing a practical, singular task.
Language and location settings also highlight a major gap in personalization technology. Despite having accounts, browsers, and operating systems explicitly set to English, users are frequently bombarded with content in local languages based solely on their physical location. This persists even when the user is logged into global accounts that store these language preferences. Whether it is a gaming store resetting to Finnish or a banking app sending irrelevant visa information that ignores passport data, the digital experience is often disjointed and frustratingly unaware of the user's documented identity.
The advertising experience remains particularly clumsy and unrefined. Users are frequently targeted with high-value items they would never purchase, such as industrial equipment or marketing software, often based on a single accidental click. This creates a feedback loop where an errant interaction forces the system to miscategorize the user indefinitely. Furthermore, services continue to promote products for family situations or financial needs that the user does not have, proving that the vast archives of personal data being collected are rarely put to effective use.
Ultimately, the frustration lies in the discrepancy between the depth of data tracking and the shallowness of the resulting user experience. The sense of being monitored is constant, yet the lack of genuine intelligence in how that data is applied is glaring. If companies are already engaged in such extensive tracking, it is disappointing that they cannot perform the basic functions of providing relevant content or remembering simple user settings, leaving the promise of hyper-personalized technology largely unfulfilled.
417 comments • Comments Link
• 复杂的推荐算法往往抓不住简单、长期的用户偏好，比如想排除某些音乐类型或特定人声内容，却依然会反复收到重复且令人恼火的推荐。
• 针对已购买商品（如大型家电或家具）的持续广告，普遍被认为是逻辑上的失败。虽然也有人认为这能起到意图启发的作用，或是在用来巩固先前的购买决策。
• 现代广告基础设施服务的是营销预算而不是用户体验，导致一种割裂：它最关注的是高效消耗曝光量，而不是提供真正有价值的产品发现。
• 一边是认为定向广告侵入性强、带有操纵意味的人；另一边是偶尔会从广告里找到小众且实用好物的人。两者之间存在明显张力。
• 许多用户把广告看作一种对抗性的、"思想吸血鬼"式手段：它转移了人们对自身思考的注意力，把企业利润摆在个人自主权之上。也正因如此，广告拦截技术逐渐被当作一种数字卫生措施而广泛采用。
• 行业内的观点认为，广告定向系统看似极其复杂，但它的目标只是优化点击率等指标，而这些指标未必能反映用户真正的兴趣或合乎逻辑的消费方式。
• 广告网络通常更倾向于把大规模数据收集用于心理画像、风险评估或未来的操控等"间接用途"，而不是把"展示相关广告"当作首要目标。
• 语言与本地化错误（例如忽略系统语言设置，却改用不可靠的地理定位）表明平台更依赖通用的区域数据，而不是明确掌握用户的具体偏好配置。
• 用户界面的"enshittification"（比如在单个账户里强制展示用户选择屏幕或隐藏订阅标签），通常被解读为对用户效用的忽视，转而追逐那些细微且可能误导的参与度指标。
• 现代广告的有效性常常引发争论：有人认为品牌知名度——也就是在消费者心中留下一个品牌名称——比直接点击更有价值；即便是自认为对广告"免疫"的人，这种方式依然可能奏效。
这场讨论反映出人们对当代数字体验的深层沮丧：算法推荐与广告越来越难以贴合个人用户真正的需求，甚至让人感到敌意。普遍看法是，现有的广告支持体系把广告主支出与数据采集放在基本可用性和对用户偏好的尊重之上。尽管少数人认为定向投放能够通过产品发现带来价值，但大多数人仍认为这个系统是一个有缺陷、侵入性的机制，浪费了时间与资本。归根结底，巨型平台强大的数据搜集能力与其广告长期呈现出的"愚蠢"之间的错位，说明这些系统的主要目标更像是维持庞大的监控型经济，而不是促进真正有益的消费者互动。 • Sophisticated recommendation algorithms often fail to capture simple, long-term user preferences, such as a desire to exclude specific music genres or vocal tracks, leading to repetitive and annoying content suggestions.
• Persistent advertising for products already purchased, such as major appliances or furniture, is widely perceived as a failure of logic, though some argue it functions as a heuristic for intent or a strategy to reinforce previous buying decisions.
• Modern advertising infrastructure serves marketing budgets rather than user experience, creating a disconnect where the primary incentive is to burn impressions efficiently rather than to provide genuinely helpful product discovery.
• A tension exists between those who find targeted ads intrusive and manipulative, and those who occasionally appreciate them for surfacing niche, useful products they would not have otherwise discovered.
• Many users view advertising as an adversarial, "thought-vampire" practice that distracts from personal reflection and prioritizes corporate profit over agency, leading to widespread adoption of ad-blocking technology as a form of digital hygiene.
• Internal industry perspectives suggest that ad-targeting systems are incredibly complex, yet the goal is to optimize for metrics like click-through rates, which do not necessarily align with a user's actual interests or logical consumption patterns.
• Advertising networks often prioritize bulk data collection for secondary uses, such as psychological profiling, risk assessment, or future manipulation, rather than focusing on the immediate goal of showing relevant ads.
• Language and localization errors—such as services ignoring system language settings in favor of unreliable geo-location—demonstrate that platforms prioritize generic regional data over explicit user configuration.
• The "enshittification" of user interfaces, including forced user-selection screens on single-user accounts or the hiding of subscription tabs, is often interpreted as a lack of focus on user utility in favor of minor, potentially misguided engagement metrics.
• The effectiveness of modern advertising is often debated, with some arguing that brand awareness—implanting a name in the consumer's mind—is more valuable than direct clicks, effectively working even on those who believe themselves to be immune.
The discussion reflects a deep-seated frustration with the modern digital experience, where algorithmic recommendations and advertising feel increasingly disconnected from, or even hostile to, individual user needs. There is a strong consensus that the current ad-supported web prioritizes advertiser spending and data harvesting over basic usability and respect for user preferences. While some participants argue that targeting can provide value through product discovery, the majority view the system as a flawed, intrusive mechanism that wastes time and capital. Ultimately, the mismatch between the sophisticated data collection capabilities of major platforms and the persistent "stupidity" of the ads shown suggests that the primary objective of these systems is the maintenance of a massive surveillance economy rather than the facilitation of useful consumer interactions.